Circumcision Benefits Outweigh Risks, CDC Says

In this case, at least one relevant harm would be the inherent loss of a healthy, functional, and erotogenic penile structure (25, 26), amounting to approximately 30–50 cm2 of densely innervated, elastic genital tissue in the adult organ (12, 27). —Cut a man’s risk of getting HIV from an infected female partner by 50 to 60 percent. Lower the risk of urinary tract infections during infancy, and cancer of the penis in adulthood. Most basically, the CDC’s approach runs counter to the conventional bioethical (and legal) view that unnecessary surgeries, and especially those that remove non-diseased, functional tissue from an individual without his consent, are in and of themselves harmful. Zommick compares the continuing debate about circumcision in the U.S. And research has not found circumcision to be a help in stopping spread of HIV during gay sex. And research has not found circumcision to be a help in stopping spread of HIV during gay sex.

In the West, changes were magnified. Minor bleeding and pain are the most common problems, experts say. —Lower the odds of urinary tract infections during infancy, and cancer of the penis in adulthood. E1-3. But even as the circumcision rate dropped, more medical evidence came in supporting it — particularly three rigorous and influential studies in Africa that looked at the spread of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases in circumcised and uncircumcised men and their partners. —Cut a man’s risk of getting HIV from an infected female partner by 50 to 60 percent. Vaccinations are a perfect example of this.

Other key areas of focus include offering age-appropriate services for young infants aged 0 to 60 days and adolescents (10 to 14 years). Based on the results of these studies, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that male circumcision be recognized as an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence. Publishing numerous, forceful articles in medical journals, they’ve committed to an ongoing volley with the vast scientific community supporting the VMMC scale-up abroad. In the vast majority of men, no benefits will accrue at all because they will never be exposed to the infections circumcision is claimed to prevent. To learn more about circumcision, visit the U.S. male newborns were circumcised in 1900. But then the trend reversed.

But then the trend reversed. The silence persists, she added, even in the face of studies that contradict the CDC’s findings. They also recommend that intact adult men be made aware of the benefits. More data on the long-term protective effect of circumcision on heterosexual males as well as on its efficacy in preventing HIV among MSM would be useful. The general population prevalence of HIV is about 0.4% in the US [9], and only 15% of men diagnosed with HIV infection during 2005 were reported to have acquired HIV through male–female sex [10]. So the authors’ primary conclusion is that if parents are going to circumcise for non-medically indicated reasons, it’s best to get it done right after birth. Objections included the pain and trauma of the procedure to the infant, the potential for mutilation of the penis, and lifelong “desensitization” of the penis due to the loss of the foreskin.

Email: circumcision@cdc.gov. Circumcision may lessen the chances of contracting and spreading HIV. For the next 45 days, the CDC will receive public comment before finalizing them next year. The C.D.C.’s own background report summarizing the scientific evidence cited a consumer study that found that only 10 percent of 709 heterosexual uncircumcised adult men said that they were “likely” or “very likely” to undergo circumcision, even if told it would reduce their risk of H.I.V. The guidelines are being published in the federal register Tuesday. Brady noted that most regions of the United States have had fairly stable circumcision rates, in contrast to the declining rates in the West. Jonathan Mermin, director of the CDC’s National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, told The Associated Press when the proposal was unveiled in November.

AHRQ (The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality) also cites the highest newborn circumcision rate at 65% in 1980. The handsome, dark-haired musician fears what others will think if they learn of his foreskin project, so he’s been attaching this device in secret every day for almost five years. Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America (USA). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Administrator of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). These results prompted the World Health Organization and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS to incorporate circumcision into their global HIV-prevention strategy. Given the swelling flood of critical comment, it looks as though the “tipping point” predicted by Geoffrey Miller is rapidly approaching.

Leave a Reply